Several weeks ago I noticed that Google was displaying the terms it had dropped from your search as 'Missing'. Google started routinely ignoring selected search terms towards the end of 2011 (see http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2011/11/08/dear-google-stop-messing-with-my-search/). Google's response to the outcry from searchers was to introduce the Verbatim search option. However, there was no way of checking whether all of your terms appeared in a result other than viewing the whole page. Irritating, to say the least, if you found that the top 10 results did not include all of your keywords.
Fast forward to December 2013, and some people started seeing results lists that showed missing keywords as strikethroughs. I saw them for a few days and then, just as I was preparing a blog posting on the feature, they disappeared! I assumed that they were one of Google's live experiments never to be seen again but it seems they are back. Two people contacted me today to say that they are seeing strikethroughs on missing terms. I ran my test searches again and, yes, I'm seeing them as well.
I ran the original search that prompted my November 2011 article (parrots heron island Caversham UK) and included -site:rba.co.uk in the strategy to exclude my original blog postings. Sure enough, the first two results were missing parrots and had "Missing parrots" underneath their entry in the list.
Remember, though, that Google automatically looks for variations on your search terms. Your original keyword may not be present in the results but a synonym may be, for example birds instead of parrots. I did find one entry in the top 10 results that seemed out of place. It was an article in the local newspaper. There was no 'Missing....' underneath the result but I could not find synonyms of parrots anywhere in the story. The closest was the surname of a person mentioned in the article - Parry - and I can only assume that this was Google truncating my 'parrots' keyword and looking for variations. But Parry was not highlighted in the entry in the results list as synonyms are. I shall look at the article in more detail to check that I have not missed a lurking parakeet or cockatoo!
I need to carry out more test searches to see how reliable this new feature is but, nevertheless, it is a welcome and useful addition to Google. If your top 10 results are showing strikethroughs then you know you have to either prefix the missing term with 'intext:' or use Verbatim for the whole search.
Interesting - but like so much of Google's "features" this seems inconsistent. Doing the same search as you but without the -site:rba.co.uk gave me the Wikipedia & Rightmove pages WITHOUT the "missing" on it. I tried this with a few options but it seemed to work best with your site excluded for this search. It worked for me on other searches without an exclusion word - but was inconsistent.
ReplyDeleteGoogle also seems to try and avoid showing this - and only shows highly relevant pages for all the other keywords entered with the "missing" attribute for one keyword. Otherwise it will give a list of sites with all the words if it can.
Hmmm... Wonder if it is still a live experiment or if it is a manifestation of Hummingbird. If the latter, then heaven knows what we'll see next.
ReplyDeleteI noticed the same last year and then again this week the words missing beneath searches. But mine seems very inconsistent as when I've done searches today, I don't get the "missing:" underneath items. Very strange! Perhaps still a live experiment, as you say?
ReplyDeleteIt's probably just a bug that parrots wasn't crossed out. If you search for
ReplyDeleteparrots heron island caversham uk -site:rba.co.uk "parry"
- you will see that it now is crossed out.
On the other hand (and probably unrelated), Google search *may* sometimes include a page, which does not have the keyword (searched for), but is pointed to from another page, with the given keyword in the link.
Hi, a non related question, or, well ...
ReplyDeletelook at the Google graph : http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/
there is a clear drop ... any comment or idea why ?
Thank you !
JF
Great blog.
ReplyDeletePardon my ignorance, but what is a "manifestation of Hummingbird"?
As a professional researcher, I do not want google to control my search. If I put a word in my query, it's because I want to see results with that word. This is very frustrating. Any idea if there is a work around other than quotation marks around a word?
ReplyDeleteThank you.
Jennifer, I find that Google sometimes ignores quotation marks around a word or phrase. The only way to ensure that a word appears in all of your results is to prefix it with intext: For example intext:parrots
ReplyDeleteIf you want the whole query run exactly as you have typed it in then you can use Verbatim. Run your search, and then from the search options that appear above the results select "Search Tools", then from the second line of options that appears click on "All results" and in the drop down menu "Verbatim".